ITU

International Telecommunication Union

Director: Shannon Gao — Committee Type: General Assembly

This committee examines how artificial intelligence is reshaping both cultural preservation and modern warfare. Around the world, endangered languages, traditions, and historical artifacts face extinction—but AI now enables digital restoration, reconstruction, and archiving on an unprecedented scale. These benefits come with major concerns, including cultural bias, loss of authenticity, data ownership, digital privacy, and widening global inequality.

At the same time, nations are developing Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS)—AI-driven weapons capable of selecting and engaging targets without human control. While they promise efficiency, they also raise grave issues: accountability gaps, ethical violations, escalation risks, and the lowering of barriers to warfare.

Delegates will debate how the international community should regulate AI to protect cultural heritage while preventing dangerous militarization and ensuring AI is used responsibly and equitably worldwide.

  • Across the globe, many languages, traditions, and historical records are at risk of fading away due to globalization, conflict, or the passage of time. AI offers new solutions to this challenge. For example, AI-driven restoration has helped recover lost pieces of art and rebuild historical architecture digitally, giving people access to this heritage. Meanwhile, there are critical issues, like biases, loss of authenticity, digital privacy, who owns the data, and how to reduce the inequality are also critical questions to ask.

  • As nations develop more new and advanced AI algorithms, there has been a trend of using AI in the military. Lethal Autonomous weapons systems or LAWS in short is basically describing those weapons that could select and engage targets without human control. They could reduce human calculations in warfare, but it leads to various issues too. There are accountability gaps like who is responsible if anything goes wrong. It lowers the threshold of warfare, escalates conflicts, increases inequality, and violates many humanitarian principles and those could be the topics of discussion for our delegates.

  • Arab Republic of Egypt

    Argentine Republic

    Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

    Canada

    Commonwealth of Australia

    Czech Republic

    Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka

    Federal Republic of Germany

    Federal Republic of Nigeria

    Federative Republic of Brazil

    French Republic

    Georgia

    Hellenic Republic

    Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

    Islamic Republic of Iran

    Islamic Republic of Pakistan

    Italian Republic

    Japan

    Kingdom of Belgium

    Kingdom of Denmark

    Kingdom of Morocco

    Kingdom of Norway

    Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

    Kingdom of Spain

    Kingdom of Sweden

    Kingdom of the Netherlands

    Malaysia

    New Zealand

    People's Democratic Republic of Algeria

    People's Republic of Bangladesh

    People's Republic of China

    Polish Republic

    Portuguese Republic

    Republic of Austria

    Republic of Chile

    Republic of Colombia

    Republic of Cuba

    Republic of Estonia

    Republic of Finland

    Republic of Ghana

    Republic of India

    Republic of Indonesia

    Republic of Ireland

    Republic of Iraq

    Republic of Kazakhstan

    Republic of Kenya

    Republic of Korea

    Republic of Peru

    Republic of Poland

    Republic of Rwanda

    Republic of Senegal

    Republic of Serbia

    Republic of Singapore

    Republic of South Africa

    Republic of the Philippines

    Russian Federation

    Socialist Republic of Vietnam

    State of Israel

    Swiss Confederation

    Ukraine

    United Arab Emirates

    United Kingdom

    United Mexican States

    United Republic of Tanzania

    United States of America